Mohamed Mahou (c)2010
Download as pdf document.
Download as pdf document.
Metaphysical
poetry is a movement that appeared in the seventeenth century by John
Donne and his followers. It was a digression from the main current,
characterized by sweet tones and other Elizabethan courtly-love
conventions. Indeed, the overriding feature of this movement is its
ambiguity, a fact which triggered off criticisms that slowed down and
even eclipsed its pace in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.
There are two of the major problems in approaching this movement:
working out a clear-cut definition and coping with the feeling of
unease while reading some “metaphysical” poems for the first
time. Hence, the term “strong-lined” poets which is used as a
disapprobation by some critics.
It
is difficult to define Metaphysical poetry and it is also hard to
decide what poets to include in this school. That’s why, some
critics, like Helen Gardner, in her book, The
Metaphysical
Poets
(1957), avoided giving any definition of a “Metaphysical” poem
because “it does not seem profitable.”In fact, Gardner’s view
is not beside the point. Even the term school or movement is
difficult to apply to these poets because they were not formally
affiliated; most of them did not even know or read each other. In
addition, as Gardner has pointed out, none of these poets ever
thought of himself as writing something named metaphysical. Another
striking point is the fact that the degree of the use of metaphysics
differ from one poet to another. Helen Gardner states: “All these
poems are metaphysical, but some are more metaphysical than others.”
In
his seminal essay, “The Metaphysical Poets” (1921) T.S. Eliot
points out that critics are prejudicing the case of these poets by
using the adjective” metaphysical”. According to T.S. Eliot,
these poets were “a direct and normal development of the precedent
age.” Eliot insists on the unity of European sensibility and it is
a mistake to consider seventeenth century poets “a distinct
school.”
The
term “metaphysical” was first used by John Dryden and Samuel
Johnson. It was applied to European poets of seventeenth
century such as John Donne, George Herbert, Andrew Marvel and Henry
Vaughan. Dryden and Johnson disapprove of “the unnaturalness” of
these poets. Dryden said of Donne:
He
affects the metaphysical, not only in his satires, but in his amorous
verses, where nature only should reign; and perplexes the minds of
the fair sex with speculations of philosophy, when he should engage
their hearts, and entertain them with the softness of love. In
this…Mr. Cowley has copied him to a fault”
Patently,
metaphysical
poets go beyond the physical. They acquired a reputation for
originality and intricacy. They investigated the world by rational
discussion of its phenomena rather than by emotions and intuition.
They came under the influence of the development of sciences and the
rise of Protestant teachings. The reader of these poems will stare in
bewilderment when noticing the extensive use of paradoxical images,
often called “metaphysical conceits.” Added to that is the
concentration of meaning which, in fact, “confuses the pleasures of
poetry with the pleasures of puzzles.” Thus, huge demands and
challenges fall upon the reader to make these poems out. This leads
some critics like Samuel Johnson to deduce that these poets aim at
showing their learning as their whole endeavour.
What
may fitfully assuage the reader’s bewilderment and confusion is the
use of ordinary situations and colloquial voices in metaphysical
poems. Helen Gardner puts forward:
“Dryden
praised Donne for expressing deep thoughts in common language. He’s
equally remarkable for having extraordinary thoughts in
ordinary situations.”In a parallel fashion, T.S.Eliot states that
the seventeenth century poets were able to “devour” any kind of
experience, be it simple or complex. By way of contrast, Romantic
poets, later on, adopted this style, trying to democratize poetry.
These poets, like their predecessors, chose incidents of common life
and used a language really spoken by people. In his “Preface to
Lyrical Ballads” (1802), W. Wordsworth emphasizes that the low and
rustic life is “the better soil of passions of the heart.” It
would be appropriate to affirm that metaphysical poets used ordinary
situations, but with an outstanding difference. Unlike Romantic
poets, the poetry of strong lines was mired in ambiguity and
hyperbolic abstractions. There was a tendency to use scientific and
mechanical tools such as compasses and telescopes in love lyrics,
woven strangely in “a passionate paradoxical reasoning.”
Indeed,
this brief and intense meditation has leveled harsh
criticisms at metaphysical poets. Donne’s celebrated metaphysical
images are described by Samuel Johnson as “the most heterogeneous
ideas…yoked by violence together.” Alexander Pope in his poem,”
The Essay on Criticism”, describes the strong-lined poets as the
fools who seek “a critic’s noble name.” Alexander Pope states:
“Some
are bewildered in the Maze of schools,
And
some made coxcombs Nature meant but fools
In
search of wit these lose their common sense
And
turn critics in their own defense.”
Even
T.S.Eliot, a strong adherent
of the movement, found some faults with these poets. He claims that
they were too much interested in philosophy and they were engaged in
“task of trying to find the verbal equivalent for states of mind
and feeling.” Though he has conceded that their work is often
intellectually stimulating, Johnson claimed that the metaphysical
poets failed to move the affections and to reach the sublime.
As
a conclusion, the school
of Donne was made for clever and well educated readers. Lazy ones
will have to read and reread their poems and will eventually make a
little out of them. In fact, the difficulties presented by
metaphysical poets or the equivocal generation will be a challenge
not only for the readers, but also teachers. The latter will face the
problem of finding beauty in a dry soil of, to use Pope’s words,
“half-learned witlings.” The use of extensive conceits may kill
strong-lined poems like “bodies perish through excess of blood.”
Written
by: MAHOU
Mohamed
26-
10- 2010
References:
-
Alexander Pope, “An Essay on Criticism”
-
Helen
Gardner, The
Metaphysical Poets (1957)
-
T.S.
Eliot, “The Metaphysical Poets” (1921)
-
Norton
Anthology
No comments:
Post a Comment